50 to 80 Marketing
Well, between working on DevRiot for VS 2005 and my friends' RCP project, I am having time to compare the two most used IDEs in the market.
It amazes me how the new bells and whistles added over time to these IDEs address so little the costs that are crippling most software shops. Testing and debugging shared 50% of the costs of a software project back when the first edition of the MMM came out. Now the same pair share up to 80% of the costs of a software project (according to NIST figures)
It is nice to have code-completion to the max but how does that reduce that 80%?
It seems that the game is about who messes things up the least, instead of who improves things the most.
Labels: .Net desktop, QA_Automation, Software_Automation, Software_process_improvement, Visual_Studio_Package


