Who needs a cheaper, faster way of creating software?

Last week, I asked people from different groups on the web to give me their thoughts/opinions on the white paper. There were favorable opinions, not so favorables ones, and suggestions.

But the thing that struck me the most was when it was argued that the difference between software and the Ford example is that Ford and the assembly line tried to produce goods with least amount of difference between them at a maximum rate and at a minimum cost. I do not understand how this does not apply to software.

The argument went on to saying that software is different because it is an intellectual effort. The logical continuation of that argument should be to figure out which parts of software development are intellectual: design, writing code, code reviews, all yes. QA? just the test creation.

How much intellect is needed to: pick up the latest build, install it, run the tests, and report the results to the appropiate personnel as fast as possible so problems can be addressed promptly? Not much. It is know-how easily transferable to machines.

Furthermore, even the creation of the vast majority of the tests can be automated with the technology available today. It would be a matter of some unorthodox thinking but in theory is possible.

The way I see it is: machines are really cheap today, if we are able to push the bulk of the less valued added tasks to them, software companies will be able to free resources to high value added tasks. But, hey these are just my ramblings.

I need to get back to the code and the hardware emulation layer...